Anthony Bredberg v. Randy Middaugh

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 11, 202221-35156California775 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 11 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTHONY JAY BREDBERG, DBA B&A, No. 21-35156 Inc., D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00190-MJP Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

RANDY MIDDAUGH; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 8, 2022**

Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Anthony Bredberg appeals from the district court’s final judgment entering

summary judgment in favor of defendants Ryan Ericson, Matthew Mahaffie, and

Erin Page and dismissing Bredberg’s claims against defendants Sean Curran, Randy

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Middaugh, Emily Swaim, Paul Anderson, Alex Callender, Doug Gresham, Diane

Hennessey,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.