United States v. Manuel Antonio Valencia, United States of America v. Maria Marleny Loaiza, United States of America v. Juana Lopez, United States of America v. Miguel Antonio Carmona-Arroyave

15 F.3d 1094 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel Antonio VALENCIA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maria Marleny LOAIZA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juana LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel Antonio CARMONA-ARROYAVE, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-30458, 92-30459, 92-30490 and 93-30015. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 30, 1993. Decided Jan. 28, 1994. 1 Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and HALL, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * I. FOURTH AMENDMENT CLAIMS 3 The search of Loaiza's purse was valid. The police had a warrant to search the motel room and it was "reasonable to believe that the [purse] could conceal items of the kind portrayed in the warrant." U.S. v. Gray, 814 F.2d 49, 51 (1st Cir.1987) (citing U.S. v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798, 820-21 (1982));…