United States v. Hugh Mack Vickers

15 F.3d 1094 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hugh Mack VICKERS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30444. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1993. * Decided Dec. 20, 1993. Before: SNEED, NOONAN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Hugh Mack Vickers appeals his conviction following a guilty plea to conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1), 846. 3 Counsel for Vickers filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which identifies three issues for review: (1) whether the district court erred by denying Vickers' motion to dismiss for violation of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3161 et seq. (STA); (2) whether the district court erred by denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea; and (3) whether Vickers received ineffective assistance of counsel because trial counsel failed timely to…