United States v. Raleigh Lee Sjogren

15 F.3d 1094 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raleigh Lee SJOGREN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30045. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 6, 1994. Decided Jan. 26, 1994. Before: POOLE and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and KING, * District Judge. MEMORANDUM ** This case presents another situation arising out of state-federal cooperation in the administration of their separate criminal justice systems. 1 Appellant was charged in an information in the District Court for Douglas County, Oregon, with three counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm (one for each prior conviction as the underlying felony) and two counts of theft. Shortly before the case was to go to trial, a federal warrant was issued for appellant's arrest on a federal complaint for being a felon in possession of a firearm. In light of the federal warrant (which was not unexpected) and on the day the State case…