Kaplan

Kaplan v. Davidson CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 11, 2022B312826California3,987 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feuer, J.

Filed 7/11/22 Kaplan v. Davidson CA2/7

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

TODD STUART KAPLAN, B312826

Petitioner and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 21STRO01019) v.

DONALD DALE DAVIDSON,

Respondent and Appellant.

APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Lawrence Riff, Judge. Affirmed in part; dismissed in part. Uplift Law, Melissa G. Fulgencio and John C. Scholz for Petitioner and Appellant. Lieber & Galperin and Yury Galperin for Respondent and Appellant. _________________ Dr. Donald Dale Davidson appeals from an order denying the special motion to strike (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16; anti- SLAPP statute)1 a request for a civil harassment restraining order filed by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.