Meza

Meza v. Pacific Bell Telephone Co.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 12, 2022B317119MCalifornia10,499 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/12/22 (unmodified opinion attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

DAVE MEZA, B317119

(Kern County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. BCV-15-101572) v.

ORDER MODIFYING

PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE OPINION AND DENYING

COMPANY, REHEARING

Defendant and Respondent. [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on June 17, 2022, be modified as follows: 1. On page four, in the second sentence of the first full paragraph, insert the words “and rest periods” between “meal” and the following comma, so the language reads: failed to provide legally required meal and rest periods, 2. Delete the sentence beginning on page four with “The 2011 guidelines” and ending on page five with “positive image of the company” and insert the following in its place: The 2011 guidelines, for example, provided that technicians: were not to abandon their vehicles, were required to protect company property at all times, were not allowed to travel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.