Meza
Meza v. Pacific Bell Telephone Co.
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 7/12/22 (unmodified opinion attached)
CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
DAVE MEZA, B317119
(Kern County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. BCV-15-101572) v.
ORDER MODIFYING
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE OPINION AND DENYING
COMPANY, REHEARING
Defendant and Respondent. [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on June 17, 2022, be modified as follows: 1. On page four, in the second sentence of the first full paragraph, insert the words “and rest periods” between “meal” and the following comma, so the language reads: failed to provide legally required meal and rest periods, 2. Delete the sentence beginning on page four with “The 2011 guidelines” and ending on page five with “positive image of the company” and insert the following in its place: The 2011 guidelines, for example, provided that technicians: were not to abandon their vehicles, were required to protect company property at all times, were not allowed to travel…