Wang v. Hsu

Good Law
15 F.3d 1095·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37626
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 7, 199391-16019California1,557 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1095 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Francis S.L. WANG, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. Paul HSU, C.V. Chen, Kwan Tao Li, and Lee and Li, a partnership, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Nos. 91-16019, 91-1616:. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 10, 1993. Decided Dec. 7, 1993. 1 Before BROWNING and CANBY, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees Paul Hsu, C.V. Chen, Kwan Tao Li, and Lee and Li, a partnership, (collectively Appellants) appeal from the judgment of the district court denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial and upholding the jury verdict as modified and remitted. Appellants contend the judgment below must be reversed for the following reasons: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the jury's finding that the parties entered into a partnership agreement under which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.