United States v. Jan Young

15 F.3d 1095 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jan YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-16062. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1993. * Decided Dec. 20, 1993. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jan Young appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the United States in the government's action to collect on a defaulted student loan. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and affirm. 3 Young contends the government's action is barred by the statute of limitations. The United States concedes that the action would have been barred under the statute of limitations in effect prior to July 1, 1991, but contends that the action is timely under the Higher Education Technical Amendments of…