United States v. Roy Weiss, United States of America v. Oucho Saelee, United States of America v. Lai Chiem Saelee

15 F.3d 1095 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy WEISS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oucho SAELEE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lai Chiem SAELEE, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-30493, 93-30051 and 93-30052. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 13, 1993. Decided Jan. 11, 1994. 1 Before: BROWNING, NORRIS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges 2 Memorandum * 3 Roy Weiss, Oucho Saelee, and Lai Chiem Saelee appeal their jury convictions and sentences. All three were convicted of importing opium, conspiring to possess opium with intent to distribute it, and possessing opium with intent to distribute it. Weiss and Lai Chiem Saelee were also convicted of conspiring to import opium. We affirm. 4 * Weiss and Lai Chiem Saelee argue that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the jury's verdict. We must reject…