Valot v. Wellington Group No. 5

Good Law
15 F.3d 1095·1994 WL 6450·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6700
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 10, 199493-55407California582 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1095 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Barbara VALOT; Claude Valot, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WELLINGTON GROUP NO. 5; W. Darrow Fielder Property Management Co.; Morris D. English, Sr.; Morris D. English, Jr.; Remax Beach Cities; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55407. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 20, 1993. * Decided Jan. 10, 1994. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Barbara Valot and Claude Valot appeal pro se the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of their action against W. Darrow Fielder Property Management Company, Remax Beach Cities, Wellington Group No. 5, and others. Although the basis for the Valots' action is not clear from the complaint, they appear to allege fraud and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1961 et seq., in relation to the defendants' involvement in the foreclosure on real property owned by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.