William J. Whitsitt v. Alameda County City of Hayward Hayward Police Department Union City

15 F.3d 1095 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William J. WHITSITT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALAMEDA COUNTY; City of Hayward; Hayward Police Department; Union City; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15397. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1993. * Decided Dec. 28, 1993. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William J. Whitsitt appeals pro se the district court's dismissal with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d), of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 amended complaint against Alameda County and various other organizations and individuals alleging that his constitutional rights were violated when his driver's license was wrongfully revoked or suspended. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review the district court's dismissal for an abuse of discretion, Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 1734 (1992), and we affirm. 3 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d), an action may…