Rosa Zamora v. Irma Gonzalez Janice Mayfield David Schluter S. Castaneda Jesse Cote

15 F.3d 1095 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rosa ZAMORA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Irma GONZALEZ; Janice Mayfield; David Schluter; S. Castaneda; Jesse Cote, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55479. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 4, 1994. * Decided Jan. 11, 1994. Before: REINHARDT, O'SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rosa Zamora appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her action against District Court Judge Irma E. Gonzalez, the United States, and Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") employees for certain common law torts and for conspiracy to deprive her of her constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Dismissal of Claims Against Judge Gonzalez 4 Zamora contends that the district court erred by granting Judge Gonzalez' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. 1 This contention lacks merit. 5 We review a dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) de…