Eliseo Jimenez-Alvarez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 13, 202221-70640California682 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 13 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELISEO JIMENEZ-ALVAREZ, No. 21-70640

Petitioner, Agency No. A206-406-731

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 13, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: FRIEDLAND and KOH, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN,*** District Judge.

Eliseo Jimenez-Alvarez (“Petitioner”) petitions for review of an order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing an appeal from a decision of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Edward R. Korman, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying his applications for withholding of removal

and protection…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.