Alfredo Jimenez Ulloa v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 13, 202219-72791California409 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 13 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALFREDO JIMENEZ ULLOA, AKA No. 19-72791 Alfredo Ulloa Jimenez, Agency No. A205-722-037 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 11, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: BENNETT and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and FOOTE,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Alfredo Jimenez Ulloa, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) order upholding the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Elizabeth E. Foote, United States District Judge for the Western District of Louisiana, sitting by designation. immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of his motion to reopen.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.