Adolfo Cortes-Ambrosio v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 13, 202220-70081California542 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUL 13 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ADOLFO ALEGUNDO CORTES- No. 20-70081

AMBROSIO,

Agency No. A205-065-127 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 17, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: BYBEE, CALLAHAN, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Adolfo Cortes-Ambrosio, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions this court

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of his motion to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). reopen his removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and

we deny the petition.

We review denials of motions to reopen for an abuse of discretion.

Hernandez-Ortiz v. Garland, 32 F.4th 794, 800 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.