In re B.V. CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I.
INTRODUCTION
B.V. (Minor) took and drove her grandmother’s vehicle without permission.
About two weeks later, Minor again took and drove the vehicle without permission. She
was charged with two misdemeanors for the first incident and two felonies for the second
incident. As part of a stipulation, Minor admitted that one of the offenses from the first
incident was a misdemeanor and one of the offenses from the second incident was a
felony. The juvenile court accepted Minor’s concession and deferred entry of judgment
for one year. The juvenile court later lifted the deferral, adjudged Minor a ward of the
court, and ordered her to the maximum confinement period of three years, four months.
Minor argues, among other things, that the matter must be remanded because it is
unclear from the record whether the trial court exercised its discretion under Welfare and
2 Institutions Code section 702 (section 702) to treat Minor’s offense from the second
incident as a felony instead of a misdemeanor. We agree and remand the matter with
directions.