Robert Barboza v. U.S. Department of Labor
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 202220-70363California604 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 14 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROBERT ALLEN BARBOZA, No. 20-70363
Petitioner, LABR No. 2018-0076
v.
MEMORANDUM*
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondent,
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY,
Intervenor.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Department of Labor
Submitted July 13, 2022**
Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Robert Allen Barboza petitions pro se for review of the Administrative
Review Board’s decision affirming the administrative law judge’s summary
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). decision denying and dismissing Barboza’s complaint under the Federal Rail
Safety Act, 49 U.S.C. § 20109. We have jurisdiction, and review the agency’s
decision in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act. See 49 U.S.C.
§ 20109(d)(4); 5 U.S.C. § 706.…