Molinar

Leslie Vanaman v. Molinar

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 202221-15260California455 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUL 14 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LESLIE GREY VANAMAN, No. 21-15260

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:17-cv-00222-JCH

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MOLINAR; J. T. SHARTLE, Warden;

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; R. L.

RHODES,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John Charles Hinderaker, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 13, 2022 **

Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges

Leslie Vanaman, an inmate at the United States Penitentiary Tucson, appeals

from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). defendants in his action arising out of the prison’s rejection of an issue of a

magazine. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo, Wood v. Beauclair,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.