Leslie Vanaman v. Christopher Marlow

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 202221-15645California656 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUL 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

LESLIE GREY VANAMAN, No. 21-15645

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:16-cv-00781-JCH

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CHRISTOPHER MARLOW, Special Investigative Services Lieutenant at USP Tucson; R. L. RHODES, Warden; THERESA TALPELCIDO, Compound Attorney at USP Tucson; MITCHELL, Unknown; legal assistant to Ms. Talpelcido at USP Tucson; HAYDEN, Unknown; Dr. Hayden, SOMP Psychologist at USP Tucson; SILVA, Unknown; Lieutenant who directs officers at USP Tucson; LAWSON, Unknown; Lieutenant who directs officers at USP Tucson; VELASQUEZ, Unknown; Unit Officer at USP Tucson; FLORES, Unknown; F-Unit Counselor at USP Tucson; SAYERS, Unknown; SIA (Special Investigative agent) in his official and individual capacity at USP Tucson;

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS;

UNKNOWN PARTIES, Unknown BOP Staff, in their official capacities at USP

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Tucson,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.