Jose Barajas Centeno v. City of Carlsbad

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 202221-56274California813 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE LUIS BARAJAS CENTENO, No. 21-56274

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-01022-L-DEB v.

CITY OF CARLSBAD; DANIEL MEMORANDUM*

STEPHEN MODAFFERI,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

DOES, 1-10,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California M. James Lorenz, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and KATZMANN,***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Gary S. Katzmann, Judge for the United States Court Judge.

Jose Barajas Centeno appeals the district court’s Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal without leave to amend of Centeno’s claims under

Title II of the Americans with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.