Jose Barajas Centeno v. City of Carlsbad
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 202221-56274California813 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 14 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE LUIS BARAJAS CENTENO, No. 21-56274
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-01022-L-DEB v.
CITY OF CARLSBAD; DANIEL MEMORANDUM*
STEPHEN MODAFFERI,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
DOES, 1-10,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California M. James Lorenz, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 12, 2022** Pasadena, California
Before: WARDLAW and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and KATZMANN,***
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Gary S. Katzmann, Judge for the United States Court Judge.
Jose Barajas Centeno appeals the district court’s Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal without leave to amend of Centeno’s claims under