Enrique Antimo-Jasso v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 202220-71240California1,073 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 14 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ENRIQUE ANTIMO JASSO, No. 20-71240
Petitioner, Agency No. A070 179 280
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted July 6, 2022** Seattle, Washington
Before: HAWKINS and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and SEEBORG,*** District Judge.
Petitioner Enrique Antimo Jasso, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions
for review of a denial of a motion to reopen administrative removal proceedings by
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard Seeborg, Chief United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. §