Enrique Antimo-Jasso v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 202220-71240California1,073 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ENRIQUE ANTIMO JASSO, No. 20-71240

Petitioner, Agency No. A070 179 280

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 6, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and SEEBORG,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Enrique Antimo Jasso, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions

for review of a denial of a motion to reopen administrative removal proceedings by

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard Seeborg, Chief United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. §

1252.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.