Sotheby's

M & L Financial v. Sotheby's

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 14, 2022B312816California2,086 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiley, J.

Filed 7/14/22

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

M & L FINANCIAL, INC., B312816

Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCV12144 v.

SOTHEBY’S, INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mark V. Mooney, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.

Bienert Katzman Littrell Williams, Michael R. Williams and Nancy J. Sandoval for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, Todd E. Lundell, Adam F. Streisand, Bryan M. Wittlin and Meghan K. McCormick for Defendant and Respondent.

____________________ M & L Financial, Inc. (M&L) took 45 vivid yellow diamonds worth $4 million to Sotheby’s for auction on consignment. M&L told Sotheby’s it was the exclusive owner of the diamonds, but Sotheby’s later released them to a stranger without telling M&L. The diamonds vanished. M&L sued Sotheby’s, which escaped on demurrer. We reverse a breach of contract ruling, affirm a tort ruling, and remand. Statutory citations are to the Civil Code. We independently…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.