Sotheby's
M & L Financial v. Sotheby's
Opinion
Opinion
Wiley, J.
Filed 7/14/22
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
M & L FINANCIAL, INC., B312816
Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCV12144 v.
SOTHEBY’S, INC.,
Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mark V. Mooney, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.
Bienert Katzman Littrell Williams, Michael R. Williams and Nancy J. Sandoval for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, Todd E. Lundell, Adam F. Streisand, Bryan M. Wittlin and Meghan K. McCormick for Defendant and Respondent.
____________________ M & L Financial, Inc. (M&L) took 45 vivid yellow diamonds worth $4 million to Sotheby’s for auction on consignment. M&L told Sotheby’s it was the exclusive owner of the diamonds, but Sotheby’s later released them to a stranger without telling M&L. The diamonds vanished. M&L sued Sotheby’s, which escaped on demurrer. We reverse a breach of contract ruling, affirm a tort ruling, and remand. Statutory citations are to the Civil Code. We independently…