People v. Courts CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 15, 2022C094638California3,892 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/15/22 P. v. Courts CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Siskiyou) ---- THE PEOPLE, C094638

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. SCCRCRF20201577)

v.

JEFFERSON ERNEST COURTS,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Jefferson Ernest Courts was charged with unlawful possession of a firearm and unlawful possession of ammunition. At trial, the prosecution developed an alternative factual theory of guilt on the ammunition offense that was not shown by evidence presented at the preliminary hearing, and that was supported by the testimony of a prosecution witness who did not testify at the preliminary hearing. After a jury found defendant guilty of both offenses, the trial court imposed an aggregate sentence of seven…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.