People v. Austin CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 15, 2022G060071California5,339 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

I. Procedural History

In an information, defendant was charged with the attempted deliberate and premeditated murder of L.L. (§§ 187, subd. (a), 664, subd. (a); count 1),1 attempted kidnapping of L.L. (§§ 207, subd. (a), 664, subd. (a); count 2), stalking (§ 646.9, subd. (a); count 3); assault with a deadly weapon upon Nathaniel P. (§ 245, subd. (a)(1); count 4), and unlawful tampering with a vehicle (Veh. Code, § 10852; count 5). The prosecution also alleged defendant was armed with a firearm in the commission of the offenses charged in counts 1 through 3. (§ 12022, subd. (a)(1).) A jury trial was conducted before Judge Pham (first trial), and defendant was convicted of attempted kidnapping, stalking, and unlawful tampering with a vehicle. The jury also found defendant was armed with a firearm during the commission of the kidnapping and stalking offenses. Defendant was found not guilty of the assault charge. The jury was unable to reach a verdict on the attempted murder charge, and the court declared a mistrial on that count.

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise designated.

2 The district attorney elected to retry the attempted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.