Lausd

Michael Asfall v. Lausd

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 15, 202220-55599California2,509 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 15 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL ASFALL, No. 20-55599

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-00505-CBM-RAO v.

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL MEMORANDUM*

DISTRICT,

Defendant-Appellant.

MICHAEL ASFALL, No. 20-56259

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-00505-CBM-RAO v.

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL

DISTRICT,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

JAN MURATA, an individual; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. for the Central District of California Consuelo B. Marshall, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 15, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: SMITH,*** BADE, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Los Angeles Unified School District (“LAUSD”) appeals the district court’s

orders (1) denying LAUSD’s post-trial motions for judgment as a matter of law or a

new trial under Federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.