Jesus Rosales Henriquez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 15, 202218-73362California602 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUL 15 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JESUS EVELIO ROSALES No. 18-73362

HENRIQUEZ,

Agency No. A029-217-613 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 14, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: BEA, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Petitioner Jesus Evelio Rosales Henriquez, a native and citizen of El

Salvador, seeks review of a 2018 order reinstating a removal order from 2002.1 To

challenge the 2018 reinstatement order, Rosales Henriquez collaterally attacks the

underlying removal order, arguing it was a gross miscarriage of justice. Rosales

Henriquez timely petitioned for review of his reinstatement order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.