Daniel Quintero Diaz v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 15, 202218-72468California1,051 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 15 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL QUINTERO DIAZ; YESENIA No. 18-72468

QUINTERO FIGUEROA,

Agency Nos. A070-195-570 Petitioners, A070-195-571

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 13, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: BENNETT and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges, and FOOTE,*** District Judge.

Daniel Quintero Diaz and Yesenia Quintero Figueroa (the “Quinteros” or

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Elizabeth E. Foote, United States District Judge for the Western District of Louisiana, sitting by designation. “Petitioners”) petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”)

decision, specifically its denial of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.