Cindy Garcia-Martinez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 15, 202215-72062California450 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 15 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CINDY VANESSA GARCIA-MARTINEZ; No. 15-72062 et al., Agency Nos. A205-375-299 Petitioners, A205-301-888

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Cindy Vanessa Garcia-Martinez and her minor child, natives and citizens of

El Salvador, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order

dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their

application for asylum, and denying Garcia-Martinez’s applications for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal and relief under the Convention…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.