Ricardo Bravo-Bravo v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
40 F.4th 911
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 202220-71042California3,245 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ikuta, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICARDO BRAVO-BRAVO, No. 20-71042 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A075-265-535

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney OPINION General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 15, 2022 * Seattle, Washington

Filed July 18, 2022

Before: Richard R. Clifton and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges, and Karen K. Caldwell ** District Judge.

Opinion by Judge Ikuta

* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). ** The Honorable Karen K. Caldwell, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation. 2 BRAVO-BRAVO V. GARLAND

SUMMARY ***

Immigration

Denying Ricardo Bravo-Bravo’s petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, the panel held that: 1) 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(5), which generally bars reopening reinstated orders of removal, is not subject to an exception for removal orders that result in a gross miscarriage of justice; and 2) the agency…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.