Bonhage

Bonhage v. Rawson CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 18, 2022H047362California10,501 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilson, J.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND2

A. Factual background In August 2014, Rawson owned a house in San Jose which she rented to tenants Ali Afsin Bulbul and Esperanza Outeirino, a married couple who lived in the house with their children, for $3,200 per month rent. The lease extended through January 2015, but on August 14, 2014, Outeirino informed Rawson that the family would be leaving the property on September 15 to move into a new house they had purchased.

1 The three challenged judgments are from cases H047425, H047477, and H047362, respectively. 2 We take our facts as they relate to the three appeals from: (1) the evidence at

trial, counsel’s arguments, and the court’s instructions (Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 580-581 (Soule)); (2) the record that was before the trial court in connection with the brokers’ motion for summary judgment (Thompson v. Ioane (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 1180, 1186, fn. 4 (Thompson)); and (3) the materials submitted to the court in connection with Rawson’s motion for fees. (Cummings v. Benco Building Services (1992) 11 Cal.App.4th 1383, 1388 (Cummings).)

2 Rawson subsequently retained Murahari Amarnath as her realtor to assist…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.