Tokio Marine America Ins. v. Prestig CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 18, 2022B312917California2,926 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/18/22 Tokio Marine America Ins. v. Prestig CA2/7

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from 3citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

TOKIO MARINE AMERICA B312917

INSURANCE COMPANY,

(Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 20LBCV00504) v.

PRESTIG INC.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mark C. Kim, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Larry R. Glazer and Nicolette Glazer for Defendant and Appellant. Cammarano Law Group and Dennis A. Cammarano for Plaintiff and Respondent. _____________________ Tokio Marine America Insurance Company, as insurer- subrogee, sued Prestig Inc. (doing business as Prestige) pursuant to the Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act (49 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.