William Rouser v. Theo White
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 202220-56349California370 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 18 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM ROUSER, No. 20-56349
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:11-cv-09123-RGK-JEM
v.
MEMORANDUM*
THEO WHITE; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
E. W. MEADS, Protestant Chaplain; et al.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 12, 2022**
Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner William Rouser appeals pro se from the district
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court’s order denying Rouser’s motion for contempt for violations of a consent
decree. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of
discretion a district court’s decision to deny a motion for…