William Rouser v. Theo White

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 202220-56349California370 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM ROUSER, No. 20-56349

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:11-cv-09123-RGK-JEM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

THEO WHITE; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

E. W. MEADS, Protestant Chaplain; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner William Rouser appeals pro se from the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court’s order denying Rouser’s motion for contempt for violations of a consent

decree. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of

discretion a district court’s decision to deny a motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.