United States v. Paul Butts

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 202221-10331California232 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10331

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:05-cr-01127-DGC-1

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAUL RICHARD BUTTS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Paul Richard Butts appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

the revocation of supervised release, as well as the three-month sentence and

lifetime term of supervised release imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Butts’s counsel has filed a brief stating that

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). there are no grounds for relief, along with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.