United States v. Christopher Ceja

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 202221-30178California754 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30178

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 1:19-cr-00141-SPW-1 v. 1:19-cr-00141-SPW

CHRISTOPHER SANTILLANES CEJA,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 5, 2022 Seattle, Washington

Before: CLIFTON and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and CHEN,** District Judge.

Christopher Ceja appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss

the indictment and motion to suppress. Because there is no Speedy Trial Act or

Fourth Amendment violation, we affirm.

We review de novo a district court’s application of the Speedy Trial Act.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Edward M. Chen, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.