Stephen Yagman v. Robert Wunderlich

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 202221-56277California416 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEPHEN YAGMAN, No. 21-56277

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-06093-SB-MRW

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ROBERT WUNDERLICH; LILI BOSSE;

JOHN A. MIRISH; JULIAN A. GOLD;

LESTER J. FRIEDMAN; GEORGE

CHAVEZ; JEFF S. MUIR; HOWARD S.

FISHER; LAWRENCE WIENER; HUMA

AHMED; NOOSHIN MESHKATY;

SHARON IGNARRO; JAY SOLNIT;

RONALD SHALOWITZ; LISA K.

SCHWARTZ; DOES, Unknown Named Defendants 1-20,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Stephen Yagman appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.