Stephen Yagman v. Robert Wunderlich
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 202221-56277California416 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 18 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEPHEN YAGMAN, No. 21-56277
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-06093-SB-MRW
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ROBERT WUNDERLICH; LILI BOSSE;
JOHN A. MIRISH; JULIAN A. GOLD;
LESTER J. FRIEDMAN; GEORGE
CHAVEZ; JEFF S. MUIR; HOWARD S.
FISHER; LAWRENCE WIENER; HUMA
AHMED; NOOSHIN MESHKATY;
SHARON IGNARRO; JAY SOLNIT;
RONALD SHALOWITZ; LISA K.
SCHWARTZ; DOES, Unknown Named Defendants 1-20,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 12, 2022**
Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Stephen Yagman appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his 42…