Stephen Yagman v. Eric Garcetti

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 202221-55453California533 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEPHEN YAGMAN, No. 21-55453

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-02722-DMG-JEM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ERIC MICHAEL GARCETTI; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Stephen Yagman appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging various federal and state law claims. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Colony Cove Props., LLC v. City of Carson, 640

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). F.3d 948, 955 (9th Cir. 2011). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.