Rsa-Tumon, LLC v. Sherif Philips

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 202221-16185California573 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RSA-TUMON, LLC, No. 21-16185

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:20-cv-00025

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SHERIF A. PHILIPS,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

PITT COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL,

INC.,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Guam Frances Tydingco-Gatewood, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Sherif A. Philips appeals pro se from the district court’s orders remanding to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). state court the interpleader action brought against Philips, denying reconsideration,

and awarding attorney’s fees to RSA-Tumon, LLC. We dismiss in part and affirm

in part.

As we held previously, we lack jurisdiction to review the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.