Mark Kazalonis v. Harney County, Oregon

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 202221-35509California501 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARK KAZALONIS, No. 21-35509

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01605-SU

v.

MEMORANDUM*

HARNEY COUNTY, OREGON; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

UNKNOWN PARTY, Unknown Assistant District Attorney for Harney County Oregon; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Mark Kazalonis appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his action alleging federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 12(b)(6).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.