Mark Kazalonis v. Harney County, Oregon
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 202221-35509California501 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 18 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARK KAZALONIS, No. 21-35509
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01605-SU
v.
MEMORANDUM*
HARNEY COUNTY, OREGON; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
UNKNOWN PARTY, Unknown Assistant District Attorney for Harney County Oregon; et al.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 12, 2022**
Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Mark Kazalonis appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
his action alleging federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28
U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 12(b)(6).…