Chapman
Fred Devine v. Chapman
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 202221-16207California325 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 18 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FRED DEVINE, No. 21-16207
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05745-SMB-
MTM
v.
CHAPMAN, Unknown; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellees,
and
PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT; et al.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 12, 2022**
Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Fred Devine appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force in connection with his arrest.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v.
Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We…