Chapman

Fred Devine v. Chapman

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 202221-16207California325 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRED DEVINE, No. 21-16207

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05745-SMB-

MTM

v.

CHAPMAN, Unknown; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees,

and

PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Fred Devine appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force in connection with his arrest.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v.

Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.