Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Usepa
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 202220-73146California366 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 18 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY; No. 20-73146
CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY,
EPA No. Petitioners, EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0038-0040
v.
MEMORANDUM*
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY,
Respondent, ______________________________
VALENT U.S.A. LLC,
Intervenor.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Environmental Protection Agency
Argued and Submitted July 7, 2022 Portland, Oregon
Before: R. NELSON and LEE, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF,** District Judge.
Petitioners Center for Biological Diversity (“CBD”) and Center for Food
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. Safety challenge an order by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”)
registering a new fungicide called inpyrfluxam.1 We have jurisdiction under 7
U.S.C. § 136n(b) and grant the petition in part, and remand to the EPA…