Iolab Corporation v. Seaboard Surety Company

Good Law
15 F.3d 1500·94 Daily Journal DAR 1113·29 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1610·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1354·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 625
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 199492-55642California4,135 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1500 29 U.S.P.Q.2d 1610 IOLAB CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY; Employers Reinsurance Corporation; Republic Insurance; Lexington Insurance Company; Employers Insurance of Wausau; Allstate Insurance Company; Granite State Insurance Company; National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.; North River Insurance Company et al.; American Motorists Insurance Company and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company; Stonewall Insurance Company; Insurance Company of North America; Hartford Casualty Insurance Company and Twin City Fire Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55642. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 4, 1993. Decided Jan. 28, 1994. Robert P. Lobue, Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler, New York, New York and Michael J. O'Connor, Christensen, White, Miller, Fink & Jacobs, Los Angeles, California, for the plaintiff-appellant. Robert A. Zeavin, Shane & Paolillo, Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellee Seaboard Surety. Scott T. Pratt, Keesal, Young & Logan, Long Beach, California, for defendant-appellee Employers Reinsurance. Linda S. Dakin, Chadbourne & Parke, Los…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.