Black v. High Desert Medical Group CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 19, 2022B300957California2,075 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/19/22 Black v. High Desert Medical Group CA2/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

DAVID BLACK, B300957

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC656902) v.

HIGH DESERT MEDICAL GROUP

et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Los Angeles Superior Court, John Doyle, Judge. Affirmed. David E. Black, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Bonne, Bridges, Mueller, O’Keefe & Nichols and Mitzie Dobson; Cole Pedroza, Kenneth R. Pedroza, Matthew S. Levinson and Nayri Jilizian for Defendants and Respondents High Desert Medical Group, Charles M. Lim, M.D., Marvin Ginsburg, M.D., Kourosh Golestany, M.D., Dennis Latuno, M.D. and Davy Figueroa, M.D.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.