United States v. Jack Sherman Steward

Good Law
16 F.3d 317·94 Daily Journal DAR 1474·1994 WL 28694·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1673·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 879
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 4, 199492-10513California2,771 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lay, J.

ORDER

The opinion filed October 8, 1998, 7 F.3d 164 , is withdrawn.

OPINION

Jack Sherman Steward appeals from his convictions for attempting to sell methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and 21 U.S.C. § 846 , and use of a firearm in relation to a drug offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c). Steward also appeals his sentence. We affirm the judgment of conviction but vacate the sentence and remand to the district court for resen-tencing.

Steward was convicted of attempting to sell undercover agent Bernard Zapor of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms one-fourth of a pound of methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance. See 21 U.S.C. § 812 . The government’s evidence at trial revealed that Steward and Zapor discussed a methamphetamine transaction and then met to complete the sale in the parking lot of the Fairfield Inn in Phoenix, Arizona. Officers immediately arrested Steward. They found a loaded semiautomatic handgun in the waistband of his pants. Subsequent analysis of the drugs determined that the substance Steward provided the undercover agent was not methamphetamine. Instead, it was ephedrine, a substance used in the manufacture of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.