Dannenberg v. The Software Toolworks Inc.

Good Law
16 F.3d 1073·94 Daily Journal DAR 2135·28 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 128·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 2678·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1210
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 199492-16718California3,397 words

Opinion

Opinion

16 F.3d 1073 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,078, 28 Fed.R.Serv.3d 128 Richard B. DANNENBERG; Mindy Blitz; Kenneth Homer Fleisher; Steven G. Cooperman; Nathaniel Orme; Ervin H. Fishman, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The SOFTWARE TOOLWORKS INC.; Leslie Crane; Elizabeth M. Barker; Deloitte & Touche, et al.; PaineWebber Incorporated; Montgomery Securities, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16718. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 13, 1993. Decided Feb. 18, 1994. Leonard B. Simon and Alan Schulman, Milberg Weiss Bershad Spechthrie & Lerach, San Diego, California; Sherrie R. Savett, Berger & Montague, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Ronald Litowitz, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Gorssmann, New York, New York, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Leslie G. Landau, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Deloitte & Touche. Boris Feldman, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, Palo Alto, California, for defendants-appellees Montgomery Securities and PaineWebber. William F. Alderman, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, San Francisco, California, for amicus curiae. Appeal from the United States District…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.