Terry Bowen v. Peggy L. Kernan, Warden, Csp Attorney General of the State of California Daniel E. Lungren

17 F.3d 393 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Terry BOWEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Peggy L. KERNAN, Warden, CSP; Attorney General of the State of California; Daniel E. Lungren, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-55601. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 23, 1993. * Decided Feb. 9, 1994. 1 Before: SNEED, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Terry Bowen, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas corpus petition. He contends that habeas relief should have been granted because (1) his enhanced sentence violates the ex post facto clause; (2) the state court failed during the sentencing phase to apprise him of his fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination, the right to trial by jury, and his right to confront witnesses; and (3) his sentence violates state law. We reject those contentions, and we affirm. DISCUSSION 1. Ex Post Facto Clause 4 Bowen was…