Harold L. Cook v. McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Company

17 F.3d 393 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Harold L. COOK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McDONNELL DOUGLAS HELICOPTER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15947. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1994. * Decided Feb. 17, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Harold L. Cook appeals the district court's summary judgment in favor of McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Company (MDHC) in his employment discrimination action alleging gender discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e, et seq. (Title VII), age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 621 et seq. (ADEA), and race discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1981 (Sec. 1981). Cook contends the district court erred by granting summary judgment because he raised an issue of material fact as to pretext. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec.…