Alan H. Blair v. Gene Ramsey Daniel Alban James May Douglas L. Kraemer

17 F.3d 393 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alan H. BLAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gene RAMSEY; Daniel Alban; James May; Douglas L. Kraemer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36593. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 20, 1993. * Decided Jan. 7, 1994. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Alan H. Blair appeals pro se the district court's order granting summary judgment to all defendants based on judicial immunity and qualified immunity. In his complaint, Blair claims violations of various constitutional rights regarding his being found guilty of certain traffic infractions and the suspension of his driving privileges. We conclude that the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction, and we vacate the judgment and remand with instructions to enter a judgment of dismissal. 3 As a preliminary matter, we must determine whether the federal courts have jurisdiction to hear Blair's action. See MacKay v.…