Richard E. Becker v. State of California, City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Bar Association

17 F.3d 393 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard E. BECKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Bar Association, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16676. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 26, 1993. * Decided Feb. 10, 1994. Before: CHOY, GOODWIN, and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Richard E. Becker appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing his action with prejudice for failure to state a claim, or alternatively, for summary judgment. The underlying district court judgment was entered on May 20, 1992. Becker filed a letter requesting reconsideration on June 1, 1992, and on June 5, 1992, he filed a formal motion for reconsideration. The district court denied Becker's motion for reconsideration on August 24, 1992, and the order denying the motion was entered on August 26, 1992. 3 On September 8, 1992, Becker filed a notice of appeal with this court.…