Edward C. Jenkins v. Robert G. Borg James Gomez, Director, Department of Corrections

17 F.3d 394 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward C. JENKINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert G. BORG; James Gomez, Director, Department of Corrections, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-16082. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1994. * Decided Feb. 11, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Edward Charles Jenkins, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Jenkins claims that he was subjected to consecutive sentences that were not authorized by state law, and thus that he was denied due process of law. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 , and review de novo. Thomas v. Lewis, 945 F.2d 1119, 1122 (9th Cir.1991). We affirm. 3 Jenkins was convicted for forcible sodomy and forcible oral copulation, in violation of Cal.Penal Code Secs. 286(c) and 288a(c). These statutes require that…