Hoppel v. Blue Cross of Washington and Alaska, Inc.

Good Law
17 F.3d 394·1994 WL 55551·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9311
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 199492-36761California128 words

Opinion

17 F.3d 394 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Olaree E. HOPPEL, Plaintiff-Appellant v. BLUE CROSS OF WASHINGTON AND ALASKA, INC.; Blue Cross of Washington and Alaska Supplemental Retirement Program; Blue Cross of Washington and Alaska Deferred Income Plan; Robert Richmond, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36761. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 3, 1994. Decided Feb. 23, 1994. 1 Before: GOODWIN, SCHROEDER, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges JUDGMENT ORDER 2 The judgment is AFFIRMED for the reasons stated by the district court. See Order on Motions for Summary Judgment, ER at 55.